The ISEP Greenhouse Gas Management Hierarchy (GHG Hierarchy) is a structured framework designed to guide organisations in systematically reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

Recognised as the global best-practice approach for tackling the emissions that cause climate change by the UNFCCC and ISO, the GHG Hierarchy has always been an open-source resource.

First created in 2009 by the Institute of Sustainability and Environmental Professionals (ISEP) – when known as IEMA – it has since been through several updates to align with evolving mitigation and net-zero targets.

Since 2015 it has been recognised and referenced by the UNFCCC as the globally applicable model for organisations planning their pathways and transitions to net-zero.

From 2020 it has been referenced by International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in their Guidelines for addressing climate change in standards.

Over the years, many businesses have used this resource to support transition planning, while organisations, researchers and students all around the world have referenced the GHG Hierarchy in their reports. The resource remains freely downloadable for public use and re-publication (subject to attribution).

image

The purpose of the GHG Hierarchy has remained consistent:

•    Prioritising meaningful action: The hierarchy emphasises tackling emissions at their source rather than relying solely on offsets.
•    Supporting net-zero transitions: It provides a roadmap for organisations aiming to achieve net-zero emissions, in line with global climate agreements like the UNFCCC Paris Agreement.
•    Standardising best practices: By offering a clear structure, it helps unify approaches across industries and sectors.

How it is used

Organisations use the hierarchy to plan and implement sustainability strategies. It consists of four levels:

  LEVEL ACTION GOAL  
1. ELIMINATE Prevent GHG emissions entirely by changing business models or operations. Avoid emissions-generating activities from the outset.  
2. REDUCE Improve efficiency in processes, energy use, and operations. Achieve real reductions in emissions.  
3. SUBSTITUTE Switch to renewable or low-carbon technologies. Lower the carbon intensity of energy sources.  
4. REMOVE Balance residual emissions through removals or carbon credits. Prioritise removal emissions via projects within organisational control and with a low risk of reversal.  

Strategic impact

•    Encourages proactive planning rather than reactive offsetting.
•    Helps businesses align with science-based targets, transition planning, and climate-related financial disclosures.
•    Easy to understand - promotes engagement across the workforce, making sustainability a shared responsibility.

 

Compatibility with international standards and frameworks

The terminology of ‘emissions hierarchies’ has been picked up by international standards, with complementary meanings and usage.

For instance, BS ISO 14068-1:2023 Climate change management – 'Transition to net zero Part 1: Carbon neutrality' describes the hierarchy approach to carbon neutrality as being ‘primarily achieved through GHG emission reductions, then GHG removal enhancements within the boundary of the subject, before offsetting’. This builds on the ISEP Greenhouse Gas Management Hierarchy, in which the stages eliminate, reduce, substitute guide organisations in systematically reducing the greenhouse gas emissions within their boundaries, before the stage 'remove' which is addressed in the standard.

 

Using the GHG Management Hierarchy

The ISEP GHG Management Hierarchy has been designed by ISEP to support sustainability professionals to guide their organisations’ strategic decision making process by setting out a series of best practice steps. 

However, while the hierarchy provides a framing and scoping approach, supporting efforts to seek out significant carbon savings within the organisation, it is recognised that context will vary and in all cases, transition actions themselves should not be restricted by a fixed sequential approach. Actions that can be taken in the three stages of eliminate, reduce and substitute should not be held up or delayed because previous steps cannot be taken immediately.

Avoided emissions, and mass-balancing of emissions outside the value chain, are not part of the GHG Hierarchy and should only be used for calculations when all previous options have been exhausted.

Case Studies | How companies are applying the GHG Management Hierarchy

  • KAEFER UK & Ireland
  • Acclaro Advisory for Churchill Group
  • voestalpine Turnout Technology UK

KAEFER UK & Ireland

KAEFER UK & Ireland is a leading provider of technical services across the energy, 
industrial, nuclear, and construction sectors, is committed to reducing its environmental impact and managing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in a structured way.

The company’s carbon reduction targets are SBTi-approved, demonstrating alignment with science-based pathways to limit global warming. To guide its  approach, KAEFER adopted the ISEP GHG Hierarchy, prioritising actions to Eliminate → Reduce → Substitute → Remove.

image

Acclaro Advisory for Churchill Group

Churchill Group, a UK-based facilities management company, partnered with Acclaro Advisory to design and deliver a supplier engagement programme focused on  improving the Climate-related maturity of its suppliers - emissions measurement and management. This aims to reduce Scope 3 emissions across its value chain.

image

voestalpine Turnout Technology UK

voestalpine Turnout Technology UK (vaTTUK) specialise in the design, manufacture, and supply of railway infrastructure such as switches, crossings, and related  components for railway tracks. They are key suppliers for major rail operators in the UK and Republic of Ireland, including supporting projects like High Speed 2 (HS2).  

The Group’s carbon reduction targets are SBTi-approved and carbon management has become a key priority at vaTTUK - structured around the requirements of the PAS 2080 carbon reduction hierarchy on a project-level basis, and the GHG Management hierarchy across the wider organisational carbon footprint. Both hierarchies drive the business to avoid or eliminate emissions; switch or substitute where elimination is not possible; and finally improve carbon intensity or remove the emissions  sssociated with activities.  

image

Email Senior Policy and Engagement Lead Chloe Fiddy to propose a Case Study

Email Senior Policy and Engagement Lead Chloe Fiddy to propose a How-to Guide

The GHG Management Hierarchy timeline

2026 03 ISEP GHG Hierarchy Timeline
2026 03 ISEP Sector Page Construction & Infrastructure (1)

Join the Register of Carbon Accountants and Auditors

ISEP has launched a new Register of Carbon Accountants and Auditors, a groundbreaking initiative that allows professionals to showcase their expertise in carbon accounting and auditing. 

Applications to join the Register are currently open at Technical Associate Carbon Accountant (TACA) level and are available exclusively to individuals who have successfully completed an ISEP-approved training course.

Other policy and practice areas

Individual Membership FORB

Want to know more?

To find out more about the work of ISEP's Policy and Public Affairs team, please get in touch.