Informed by a workshop of ISEP members and key stakeholders, ISEP noted the following considerations should be taken into account:
–> It’s too short a time after implementation to make major changes.
–> Developers, ecologists, and local authorities are still learning about the implementation of BNG.
–> It is mostly the smallest of the minor developments/small sites that are struggling to meet BNG.
–> The consultation seems to be more about making the process of BNG easier than finding solutions for negative impacts on nature.
–> The removal of BNG for minor developments/small sites will have a significant impact on the availability of biodiversity units.
There has been a groundswell of disapproval across relevant stakeholders to this consultation and we wait to see any changes that come as a result.
ISEP made the following recommendations:
–> The Government do not exempt all minor developments/small sites from BNG.
–> Only small, evidence-based changes are made with regard to how BNG is completed on minor developments/small sites.
–> BNG should have more time to become established before any major changes are made.
–> Mandate the smallest of the minor developments/small sites to undertake an environmental improvement instead of BNG with all other minor development/small sites continuing to undertake BNG of a minimum of 10%.
–> Create more guidance and training on competence to use the Small Sites Metric.
–> Do not create the new category of ‘medium’ sites and continue to use the Statutory Biodiversity Metric (rather than the Small Sites Metric as proposed).